An Examination of the Historical and Current Diagnostic Frameworks for EHS
We wish to clarify our position regarding Dariusz Leszczynski’s assertion that no established diagnostic criteria exist for Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity (EHS). While his paper highlights challenges and advocates for further research, it’s important to recognise that the science surrounding EHS diagnosis is not only ongoing but also deeply rooted in historical research. Scientists like Magda Havas, researchers in Russia, and many others have been documenting diagnostic methods for EHS for years.
This post aims to underscore the robust, objective evidence demonstrating that EHS can be diagnosed and to counter the notion that EHS lacks clinical legitimacy.
Pilot questionnaire survey shows the lack of diagnostic criteria for electromagnetic hypersensitivity: a viewpoint
By Dariusz Leszczynski
Published in mHealth, Vol. 11 (on 14 July 2025)
🔗 Read the full article: Pilot questionnaire survey shows the lack of diagnostic criteria for electromagnetic hypersensitivity: a viewpoint – Leszczynski – mHealth
Summary of Leszczynski’s Article
In his recent article titled “Pilot questionnaire survey shows the lack of diagnostic criteria for electromagnetic hypersensitivity: a viewpoint,” Dariusz Leszczynski argues that the absence of standardised diagnostic guidelines makes EHS challenging to recognise within mainstream medicine. He conducted an online survey with a limited response and, based on this small dataset, concluded that diagnostic protocols are lacking and more research is needed.
While the article addresses legitimate concerns about gaps in the medical system, it overlooks the growing body of scientific work that already addresses these issues, including measurable biological responses to electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure and decades of clinical observations from around the world.
Established Diagnostic Approaches Have Been in Use for Decades
Contrary to the notion that EHS diagnosis is purely speculative or unsupported, diagnostic protocols have been developed and utilised for decades. Notably:
- ◆ Aug 11, 2025 – What is Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity? The following new short film from Dr. Joel Moskowitz featured on SciTube, offers a concise, evidence-based introduction to Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity, supported by published scientific research. The content reflects growing concerns within the scientific community about EMF exposure and public health. https://radiationresearch.org/what-is-electromagnetic-hypersensitivity/
- ◆ Professor Oleg Grigoriev’s 2010 Presentation: In January 2010, Professor Oleg Grigoriev presented at the Institution of Mechanical Engineers in London, invited by the EM Radiation Research Trust, on “Health and EMF Exposure: Protocol for Diagnostics and Therapy.” This presentation detailed clinical methods based on measurable biological markers, nervous system biomarkers, and inflammatory indicators.
- ◆ EUROPAEM EMF Guideline 2016: The EUROPAEM EMF Guideline 2016 provides clear diagnostic criteria and treatment recommendations for EMF-related health conditions, including EHS. Sections 4 to 6 (pages 12–18) outline diagnostic frameworks, clinical presentations, and management strategies that have been applied across Europe, reflecting growing clinical recognition of EHS.
These examples demonstrate that recognised, evidence-based diagnostic protocols for EHS exist, contradicting the idea that EHS lacks clinical legitimacy.
EM Radiation Research Trust Response
We welcome the publication of this article, which rightly identifies a critical gap in how the medical system responds to Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity (EHS). However, it’s important to challenge the implication that the lack of standardised diagnostic criteria equates to a lack of objective scientific basis or clinical legitimacy for EHS.
Response from Dariusz Leszczynski
Following the publication of his article, Dariusz Leszczynski shared a detailed response on 21 July 2025 addressing some of the points raised about his conclusions. While his reply acknowledges challenges in diagnosing Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity (EHS) and calls for further research, it stops short of fully recognising the substantial body of evidence and lived experiences that support EHS as a genuine condition. We include a link to his response here for transparency and encourage readers to consider the full spectrum of scientific discourse on this complex issue.
🔗 Read Dariusz Leszczynski’s response
Objective Evidence Exists
Research by scientists such as Dr. Magda Havas has consistently shown that individuals with EHS can exhibit measurable physiological changes in response to EMF exposure, including alterations in heart rate variability, blood sugar levels, and skin conductance. These findings dispute the notion that EHS is purely psychosomatic. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrDfztH-gOw
Likewise, Michael Bevington’s book Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity, published by ElectroSensitivity UK (ES-UK), includes over 1,800 scientific references and serves as an invaluable resource for clinicians and policy professionals seeking to understand the breadth of existing evidence.
Testimony from the Front Lines of Science and Medicine
- ◆ BMJ Rapid Response: In a recent Rapid Response published in The BMJ on 23 July 2025, Steven Comyns emphasises the urgent need for a multidisciplinary and compassionate approach to managing individuals who identify as sensitive to electromagnetic fields (EMFs). The letter acknowledges the stress and anxiety faced by these patients and highlights the importance of collaboration across medical specialties to provide holistic care. https://www.bmj.com/content/390/bmj.r1288/rr-1
- ◆ General Practitioner’s Letter: In a compelling letter published by ES-UK, a UK General Practitioner affirms: “I have seen patients in my clinic who clearly and repeatedly react to electromagnetic fields. These are intelligent, articulate individuals who can pinpoint sources of exposure and describe a consistent, reproducible pattern of symptoms… This is not a mental illness; it is a real and present biological reaction.” The GP stresses the lack of medical education on this subject and the urgent need for the NHS and professional bodies to recognize EHS as a legitimate and diagnosable condition. https://radiationresearch.org/electro-sensitivity-a-very-real-illness/
- ◆ Diagnosis, Treatment and Reversal of Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity by Erica Mallery-Blythe MD https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_iP-Zv3VLV4
- ◆ Dr. Erica Mallery-Blythe, Non-Ionizing Radiation and Vulnerable Groups https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYG3aPx8tGU
EHS: A Global Humanitarian Crisis Demanding Urgent Recognition and Action
📌 International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields – Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity (EHS) is a humanitarian crisis that requires an urgent response. 🔗https://icbe-emf.org/activities/electrohypersensitivity/
📌 (2025) A mechanistic understanding of human magnetoreception validates the phenomenon of electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) “A Mechanistic Understanding of Human Magnetoreception Validates the Phenomenon of Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity (EHS)” Denis L. Henshaw & Alasdair Philips (Int J Radiat Biol, 2025).
📌EUROPAEM EMF Guideline 2016 (Sections 4-6, pp. 12-18) EUROPAEM EMF Guideline 2016 for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of EMF-related health problems and illnesses
📌 Defining Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity (EHS) April 2025 https://www.openaccessgovernment.org/article/defining-electromagnetic-hypersensitivity-ehs/190968/
📌Physicians for Safe Technology Physicians for Safe Technology | Electrosensitivity
Global Leadership in Diagnosis: Russia’s Example
The EM Radiation Research Trust has hosted international experts who are far ahead of the West in developing diagnostic frameworks:
The EM Radiation Research Trust has hosted international experts who are far ahead of the West in developing diagnostic frameworks:
- ◆ January 2010, London – Professor Oleg Grigoriev of the Russian National Committee on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection presented the “Health and EMF Exposure: Protocol for Diagnostics and Therapy.” This included diagnostic criteria and therapeutic approaches based on nervous system biomarkers, inflammation indicators, and measurable biological changes.
📄 Download the 2010 presentation https://radiationresearch.org/dr-oleg-grigoriev-2010-presentation/
- ◆ June 2015, London – Professor Grigoriev returned with colleague Dr. Victoria Alekseeva for a seminar entitled “Electromagnetic Pollution and Central Nervous System Reactions.” Watch the presentation here: ▶️ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82zlghOKN24
Photo featuring Eileen O’Connor, Professor Oleg Grigoriev, Dr Erica Mallery-Blythe, Dr Isaac Jamieson, Dr. Victoria Alekseeva, Mike Bell and Brian Stein
Growing Recognition of EHS: Science, Guidelines, and Legal Support
- ◆ Swiss Parliament Motion: A powerful new motion from MP Mahaim Raphaël (Green Party) demands that the Swiss government legally recognize Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity (EHS) as a serious environmental illness or disability. Over 800,000 people in Switzerland may be affected, suffering from insomnia, headaches, exhaustion, tinnitus, and more due to wireless radiation exposure. The motion calls for legal recognition of EHS, insurance and disability support, training for medical professionals, and the use of scientific studies for diagnosis, prevention, and treatment. Swiss Parliament calls for recognition of Electrohypersensitivity (EHS)
- ◆ PHIRE Medical: PHIRE explains that EHS is a real, physical condition confirmed by studies under blinded conditions, with emerging biomarkers. There are peer-reviewed guidelines recommending avoidance of electromagnetic fields to manage it. Importantly, several legal cases have been won, including a child supported with a special education plan, showing growing recognition and support for people living with EHS. https://phiremedical.org/electromagnetic-hypersensitivity-ehs/
These events demonstrate that diagnostic protocols for EHS already exist, and have for years. Western medicine is simply lagging behind.
The Scope of the Public Health Crisis
EHS is not rare and it’s growing:
- ◆ United Kingdom: 804,000 people (1.2%) are severely affected; 2.4 million (3.6%) have moderate symptoms; 3.35 million (5%) exhibit early or mild symptoms.
- ◆ Globally: 96 million severely affected; 288 million moderately affected; over 400 million in early stages.
Moreover, recent ES-UK research suggests that 100% of the population may be subconsciously sensitive to EMFs, with 80% showing signs of chronic inflammation a core biomarker of long-term EMF stress. EHS may represent just the tip of a broader biological iceberg.
Avoidance Is the Only Protection and It’s Disappearing
Currently, the only effective management for EHS is avoiding exposure. But as 5G, smart meters, and wireless infrastructure continue to expand, safe zones are vanishing. For the severely affected, this means social exclusion, physical debilitation, and psychological trauma.
Conclusion: Action Is Urgent and Necessary
This is not just a medical issue; it’s a matter of environmental justice and public health ethics. We call for:
- ◆ The Precautionary Principle in public health and urban planning
- ◆ Recognition of lived experience and validation of EHS sufferers
- ◆ Investment in independent diagnostic research and treatment development
- ◆ Public awareness and safer technology standards
One day, we may look back in disbelief.
Electrosensitivity is one of the most misdiagnosed and underestimated health conditions of our time. We believe the day will come when the world looks back in horror at our ignorance and at the risks we took not only with our own health, but with the delicate balance of nature itself.
Too many remain addicted to wireless technology, in denial about its impacts. It’s easier to blame anything and everything else than to face the truth, because acknowledging it means change in habits, in infrastructure, in the way we live. For some, that’s a risk they’re unwilling to take.
But the real risk is in doing nothing. This chart reveals the wide range of symptoms that can be linked to exposure to man-made electromagnetic radiation. They are often dismissed, misdiagnosed, or treated in isolation, while the root cause remains unaddressed. It’s time to join the dots, confront the evidence, and take responsibility for protecting ourselves, our children, and the natural world.
The EM Radiation Research Trust remains committed to advancing dialogue, research, and advocacy to end the silence around EHS and protect those affected. The science is clear: EHS is real, diagnosable, and deserves immediate attention.
Please note: This information is provided for awareness and educational purposes. For our full disclaimer, visit radiationresearch.org/about-us.